“He summoned a crowd to Washington, drove them insane and aimed them like a loaded cannon down Pennsylvania Avenue,” the drivers wrote.
Unlike the first indictment against Mr. Trump, who has centered on his pressure campaign on Ukraine, has this one dual support and it seems the prosecutors are ready to regularly criticize the Republicans’ own criticism of Mr. To use Trump. In their brief quote, Representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming, one of ten Republicans from the House who filed a ballot, is quoted, as is Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the minority leader, who publicly said that Mr. Trump “provoked” the mob.
When their constitutional arguments in favor of Mr. Trump’s conviction, however, reaches them hundreds of years further and argues that Mr. Trump not only incited violence but also threatened the tradition of the peaceful transfer of power initiated by Washington. They also quoted debates from the founders as to who would be prosecuted and when, as well as an indictment of a former war secretary in the 19th century, to claim that the Senate clearly had the right to prosecute Mr. Trump to trial even after he leaves. office.
“There is no ‘January exception’ to accusation or any other provision of the Constitution,” the executives wrote. “A president must respond comprehensively to his conduct in office from his first day in office until his last . ‘
They also insisted that the right to free speech by the First Amendment not Mr. Trump can protect against the responsibility to incite violence that seeks to harm the Constitution, and undermine all rights that exist, including freedom of speech.
The president’s submission was narrower in design, with a longer and more detailed instruction from his lawyers early next week. Yet the contours of their defense became clear.
Advocates said the Democrats misinterpreted Trump’s actions and his intentions, denying that he was responsible for the Capitol riot or that he intended to interfere with Congress’ formalization of Biden’s victory. They said his words to supporters on January 6 – “if you do not fight like hell, you will no longer have a country” – were not intended as a call for violence, but were “about the need to fight for electoral certainty in general. “