The blogger praised Jay as a businessman, but did not agree with how Hov apparently acquires black consumers before selling companies to white people. Every time Jay-Z makes a case, the intentions of the Rap mogul are questioned. It happened when he announced he was going to buy Tidal, it happened when he announced his partnership with the NFL, and new talks are underway now that it has been shared that Jay and Jack Dorsey have a monumental agreement for Square, Inc. to acquire the majority stake in Tidal – a handshake that allegedly made Jay-Z nearly $ 300 million richer. Academics, however, has a good choice for Jay-Z, as the blogger calls him out because he allegedly plays both sides of the field. After Akademiks praised Jay as a ‘big businessman’, he made some criticism of the Roc Nation mogul. “Jay-Z bought a company, he said it was for Black creators. He said people should not support Apple and Spotify because they are white-owned and he wants something for the culture, for the artists, by the artists., and he wanted to keep it in black possession and he wanted to do it that way. he owned a black business even though we found out later when they went to the head office of Tidal in Sweden, almost none of the employees or the senior executives at Tidal were black. ‘ Academics noted that Jay had entered into a Gety deal with Sprint, where he allegedly walked away with hundreds of millions, and that the rest of his shares now belong to Square. “The Black Tidal is now owned by Jack Dorsey, the White man.” He accused Jay-Z of being a “bait and switch” businessman, adding: “That’s the only thing I do not like about the way he does things.” “He does not do it for black people, he does it for his own selfish means,” Akademiks said. Swipe below to see more about Academics analyzing Jay-Z’s moves and let us know if you agree or disagree.
Craig Barritt / Stringer / Getty Images
