A congresswoman presents the first legal request against Trump for “inciting insurgency” with the capitol on the Capitol | News Univision Politica

A Democratic congressman presented a request this March in a federal tribunal against President Donald Trump for “inciting insurgency” in the case of the April 6 Capitol, the cargo that was dropped last week at the end of its second political juice in the Senate.

Mississippi’s representative Bennie Thompson, president of the Cámara Baja National Security Committee, presented the request, as well as indicating the executor’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, and the extremist groups Proud boys y Eedwagters.

It is the first judicial action against Trump, in which many analysts hope that there will be various demands for his responsibility in the attack against the seat of Congress that will kill 5 people and destroy materials.

Aunque Trump-uitslag – exculpado el sábado en la final votaion de juicio (57 a favor y 43 en contra, el burgemeester voto bipartidista de la historie de politicos a presidents), el líder de la minoría republican en el Senado, Mitch McConnell, dijo that the scenario indicated for the accusation against Trump in the courts, which was interpreted by some as an invitation to ask the president.

In addition, the President of the Chamber of Deputies, Nancy Pelosi, announced that a special commission would be set up similar to the one investigating the intelligence incidents that would be carried out in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 to study how to organize the attack. del Poder Legislative, an initiative that can count on support in both parties.

Bajo la Ley del Ku Klux Klan

The lawsuit was filed in Washington, D.C., at the end of a year of known reconstruction as the Ku Klux Klan (1871). obstruir the job of public servants.

The indictment follows arguments in which the House of Representatives is based to impose “impeachment” on Trump for the second time and that managers Explain during the political trial: that the violence against the Capitol was not a spontaneous event that produced the caloric value of this day, but that it was a process fueled by Trump’s mentions and his team on electoral fraud.

Trump “repulsed, while slowing down,” the violent violations of his outraged sympathizers in the weeks leading up to the attack, which were preceded by speeches by the House of Representatives that miles of his followers were directed to Congress.

“The carefully orchestrated series of events that took place during Save America and the use of the Capitol in no accident or coincidence. This is a predictable and predictable culmination of a carefully coordinated campaign to intervene in the legal process required to confirm the result of your votes in the Electoral College ”, the text of the request states.

Trump, the citizen

In general, the cargo of presidents should be given protection certificates against demands for empty decisions in the ownership of the power. But it is a question of assurance that Trump will be held accountable, especially by a party that has nothing to do with the responsibilities it has as president when it comes to securing it.

“Incite a motive, intending to interfere with the efforts of the Congress to ratify the results of the elections ordained by the Constitution, without the consent of the President’s ordinary responsibilities”, Joseph Sellers, a counselor who together with the NAACP presented the request in the name of Thompson, in an interview with the AP news agency.

“In this sense, debit to its conduct, as any other private customer”, says Sellers.

This case is one of the few that has been presented to the Senate and that Trump has been accused of interrupting the activities of the Congress, which has received the votes of the Electoral College certificates given to Joe Biden’s trio in the presidential elections of 3 of November.

In the Senate trial, the attorneys who represent Trump deny that they have any intent to incite violence against congressmen and, in addition, that their expressions and political events establish protections under the Constitution, independently of which they carry out false proceedings .

Loading

Source