Arturo Nanita dice attack on the field Trufa para verdediger ‘n su hijo

Oscar Arturo Nanita dijo este lunes que la aggression que cometio contra trufa, una bulldog frances, fue para proteger a su hijo.

In an interview conducted by the program El Sol de la Mañana, the man expressed that the golfers propelled to Trufa would have caused the perita to intend to join him.

“At the moment, the cave is missing because no one has passed it as far as it is concerned. The river is empty and the perimeter is still there and it is gone and it is full,” Nanita said.

Dijo que dede pequeño ha tenido animale que que nunca había pasade algo parecido.

“Since I was ten years old he has been around for 15 days, and he’s got a lot of other things that he’s in my house too. Many of my friends have bought him from the bed he was in. I’ve never had anything like that, it’s me peor que me ha pasado “, indicó

Manifesto that is not an aggressive person and acts badly.

“I admit that I lost the cave because I loved him, I lost the cabeza and I was in the chamber and my action. I do not justify what I hice, if I stumble”,

Recall that the Animal Protection Unit will call it a psychological evaluation and it will be available sometime in the trial.

His lawyer, Enrique Vallejo, said that he had presented himself to the dean of the Saturday of the Animal Protection in order to be responsible and to continue the tax investigation without finding it.

“If there is a mediation process, we are real and have a clear conscience about what’s sued ”, said the lawyer.

Vallejo added that the law of the present should initiate a lawsuit because Nanita recognizes its failure.

Mediation process

Hechos están ahí la circunstancia es que lo que fiscalía debe determiner por qué sucedieron, hemos explicado que se present una situation donde el vio en peligro a su hijo, donde el perro le fue encima, lo tumbó, se golpeó, lloró y el perro iba a volver, se iba a tirar otra vez encima y él se desesperó y cometió el hecho ”, dijo Vallejo.

Assimilation stated that he testified about the incident before the production of the video but commented that the taxation did not pay attention to the cases.

“Our preoccupation is with the case, it is debated that the magistrate will not be molested in the dialogue with the niece or nephews,” he said.

.Source