Defendant Angel Rondon’s defense is addressed to an employee of the General Prosecutor of the Republic who was represented in the Collegiate Tribunal of the National District, by the Public Ministry as testimony ‘n vrag.
The doctors José Miguel Minier and Emery Rodríguez, claim that Carmen Nadieska Álvarez should be interrogated in the court of first instance and as a witness testimony a load del Ministerio Público.
Suppose that Álvarez is a peritone who works with the Ministry of Public Affairs, because he intends to limit this function to the defense of Ángel Rondón to prepare his own proposals.
“The testimonial works for the Procuraduría, the Procuraduría accuses and has its own informal information”, explains the lawyers.
In this sense, to apply to the Court, presiding over the magistrate Gissel Pérez Méndez, exclude the trial of the trial, During the investigation stage and the preliminary stage of the process, it was presented that Álvarez was a simple analyst and had no choice..
The defense is that Álvarez elaboró the financial analysis of companies and commercial companies by Ángel Rondón.
On this pedestal, the defense of the defender Andrés Bautista was taken, while the Public Ministry defended the allegations that Álvarez was accused of loading and unloading, as he planted the Rondón defense. Ante este pedimento, el tribunal se retiró a deliberar.