FDA, CDC advisers say they should expect many questions about AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine

Many questions.

In interviews with CNN, several vaccine advisers to the U.S. government have left no doubt as to whether AstraZeneca’s vaccine would eventually receive FDA approval. However, they said the company’s application was likely to pose problems that did not arise when the three Covid-19 vaccines currently in use in the United States – made by Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson – for them own considered. authorizations for emergency use.

“It is clear that more questions have been raised about the AstraZeneca vaccine than about any other vaccines currently allowed in the US,” said Dr. Arnold Monto, acting chairman of the FDA’s advisory committee on vaccines and related biological products, said. apply and the FDA advises whether it should be approved.

The advisers – who work at academic medical centers and not for the government – said that the reports of blood clots after vaccination, which caused more than a dozen Western European countries to suspend the use of the AstraZeneca vaccine, did not the only problem is not. Questions were also asked about other aspects of AstraZeneca’s efficacy and safety data.

“It does feel different, and it feels different, even if it is the whole blood clot formation,” said Dr. William Schaffner, a liaison member of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, said.

AstraZeneca expects to ask the FDA to authorize its Covid-19 emergency vaccine in March or early April, sources with knowledge of the company’s ongoing clinical trial told Reuters last week.

Monto, Schaffner, and other government advisers said they were looking forward to receiving the “dossier” of data on the safety and efficacy of a vaccine that the FDA is publicly announcing as a pharmaceutical company applying for emergency use.

“I will bring an open mind to this deliberation,” said Dr. Ofer Levy, a member of the FDA’s vaccine advisory committee, said.

“I’ll go where the data leads me,” says another member, Dr. H. Cody Meissner.

As more and more European countries have lifted their AstraZeneca vaccination, the company as well as international health agencies have defended the vaccine.

“Everyone’s safety is our top priority,” AstraZeneca was quoted as saying by CNN on Wednesday. “About 17 million people in the EU and the UK have now received our vaccine, and the number of cases of blood clots reported in this group is lower than the hundreds of cases that would be expected among the general population.”

The World Health Organization, UK health authorities and the European Medicines Agency have all expressed support for the AstraZeneca vaccine, saying its benefits outweigh any risks.

Despite this support, several U.S. government advisers have said they are concerned that many Americans may experience it after months of hearing questions about the AstraZeneca vaccination, and that they will not want to take it.

“It is difficult to unravel the clock,” said Dr. Paul Offit, a member of the FDA advisory committee, said. “Once people are scared, it’s hard to scare them off.”

New report on blood clots

According to an EMA statement issued on Thursday, ‘the [AstraZeneca] vaccine is not associated with an increase in the overall risk of blood clots. ‘

Have European countries made a mistake in stopping AstraZeneca shots?  Here's what health experts say

The statement said that around 20 million people in the UK and the European Union, as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway, had received the AstraZeneca vaccine since March 16, and that there were specific types of rare clotting problems associated with low platelets.

The number of reports of the rare clotting problems “exceeds the expected, and causality, although not confirmed, can therefore not be ruled out”, according to the statement, which indicates that the labeling on the vaccine will be updated to provide more information on to include these events.

One type of clot is mesenteric venous thrombosis, which is a clot in one or more of the major arteries that draws blood from the intestines. Another is cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, where a clot forms in the drainage system of the brain. A third is distributed intravascular coagulation, which is blood clots in multiple blood vessels.

The EMA said it had reviewed seven cases of disseminated intravascular coagulation and 18 cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis as of March 16.

‘One problem after another’

The AstraZeneca vaccine, developed in partnership with the University of Oxford, started with the reputation of being one of the world’s most promising Covid-19 vaccines.

South Africa suspends rollout of AstraZeneca vaccine after study shows less protection against variants
Last spring and summer, Oxford researchers pronounced it as the precursor, though they would sometimes fall back and warn against too much promise.

Dr Adrian Hill, one of Oxford’s leading scientists, has sometimes even insulted other vaccine makers, calling Modern’a Covid-19 vaccine technology ‘strange’ and ‘unproven’.

But fast forward, and it is AstraZeneca that has faced challenges. It twice suspended its clinical trials when participants who received the vaccine became ill – both times it was started again when it was determined that the diseases were not related to the vaccine.
In November, questions arose about the company’s efficacy data, and it was revealed that an error had been made in the trial and that some participants had received the wrong dose. Oxford told CNN at the time that a “difference in the manufacturing process” led to the error.
“I’ve done a lot of clinical trials with vaccines over the last few decades, and it never happened,” said Meissner, a member of the FDA’s vaccine advisory committee. “I read in their Lancet newspaper how they explained it, but it was a little torturous.”

Menelas Pangalos, executive vice president for biopharmaceutical research and development at AstraZeneca, told the Wall Street Journal in November that “the bug was actually irrelevant” and that the vaccine “reaches the approval threshold with a vaccine that is more if 60% is effective. ”

Last month, South Africa discontinued the AstraZeneca vaccine after a study showed that it offers less protection against the coronavirus variant first identified there. That study, later published in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that the AstraZeneca vaccine did not show protection against mild to moderate Covid-19 due to the variant.
Biden administration finalizes plans to ship millions of doses of AstraZeneca vaccine to Canada and Mexico

Currently, more than a dozen European countries have suspended the use of the vaccine due to concerns about blood clots.

“It’s so ironic – last summer there were usually quite reluctant British clovers who beat their own drums – ‘We’re going to be first, we’re going to be the best’ – and it’s the vaccine that has had one problem after another, Schaffner said.

A AstraZeneca spokesman pointed out to CNN the Lancet study published in January and found that the vaccine ‘has an acceptable safety profile and is effective against symptomatic COVID-19’.

A news release from AstraZeneca on Sunday said that out of 17 million people who received their vaccine in the European Union and the United Kingdom, there were 15 events of deep vein thrombosis and 22 incidents of pulmonary embolism, based on information provided by the company as of March received. 8.

“It is much lower than would be expected to occur naturally in a general population of this size,” according to the company statement, adding that there is “no evidence of an increased risk of pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or thrombocytopenia, in any defined age group, gender, group or in any particular country. ”

The news release did not mention the rare types of clotting events that European regulators discussed on Thursday.

Agreements for 300 million AstraZeneca doses

AstraZeneca already has agreements with the US government to deliver 300 million doses, according to prepared remarks the company made to Congress last month.

While government advisers have said that more vaccine is better, they say it is unclear what role AstraZeneca’s doses will play if the vaccine is granted.

There will be more than enough vaccine from Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson to vaccinate every American adult by the end of May, White House coordinator Jeff Zients said earlier this month.

The government advisers with whom CNN spoke said if the AstraZeneca vaccine is distributed in the US, they are worried that Americans may perceive it as inferior to the three already being distributed.

“I’m very worried that there will be a lot of people who would say a lot of thanks to AstraZeneca for all this publicity,” said Schaffner, the CDC adviser.

He said if demand was not enough, the US could donate part of its AstraZeneca offering to developing countries, where it would be particularly useful because it could be transported and stored more easily than Pfizer or Moderna vaccines.

The Biden administration has already planned to ship several million doses of AstraZeneca to other countries.

“I can confirm that we have 7 million redeemable doses of AstraZeneca available,” White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said at the White House press briefing on Thursday. “Of that, 2.5 million are we are working on finalizing plans to lend it to Mexico and 1.5 million to Canada.”

“We can be Solomon-like and cut the baby in half and say we’ve contracted to buy these doses, and we’ll use a third of them and give the rest away to developing countries and do some vaccination diplomacy,” he said. Schaffner said. “It’s a possibility.”

CNN’s Ryan Prior, Samira Said, Michael Nedelman and Casey Hicks contributed to this report.

.Source