Meghan’s interview with Harry and Oprah: why “The company” has a real British family and who is part of it | Gente | Maintenance

The ecos of the interview conceded by the principle of Harry and Meghan Markle and Oprah Winfrey follow themselves within and drive of United Kingdom.

The letter was communicated in March by the Buckingham Palace, in which the British real family expressed its sadness and preoccupation with the revelations raised by the Dukes of Sussex, calling for a debate on some of the details of the explosive ”conversation.

One of them was Meghan Markler’s repeated allusion to The firm (the company or the company) to deal with its life and its problems of convenience in the Windsor House.

But where does this appeal come from?

Origin diffuse

There are different theories about the origins of the term “The company” to refer to the real British family and, although none are of the same contrast, it is clear that the expression is commonly used in the news.

Some authors attribute to the principle Felipe the haber accrued the term the firm to refer to the real British family. Photo: REUTERS

It is said that the idea came in 1947 the principle of Philip, Duke of Edimburg, to walk with the entourage of Princess and current Queen of England, Isabel II.

“Compare this matrimony with bargaining with a familiar negotiation or a company”, explains writer Marlene Koenig.

Two other experts, such as the writer and periodical Penny Junor or the historian Ed Owens, authors of book submissions on the subject, the origin of the appeal is in front of this book.

In his book 2005 The Firm: The Troubled Life of the House of Windsor (“The Firm: The Attributed Life of the Windsor House”) Penny Junor related to Jorge VI, King of England from 1937 to 1952, who was first referred to the Windsor House as the firm.

“El nombre cuajó”, written by Junor.

The British real family operates in some respects as an enterprise.

An image questionnaire

The historian Ed Owens, who published in 2019 The Family Firm: monarch, mass media and the British public, 1932-53 (“The familiar company: monarchy, media and the British public”), too, is being reshuffled by Jorge VI to explain how this term will be described.

“After the crisis over the abdication of Eduardo VIII [diciembre de 1936], the politician and periodical conservator Arthur Beverley Baxter wrote a semi-superficial book halberd about the new king, Jorge VI, his wife and his daughters who are titled Destiny called them (‘El destino los llamó’) “, explains Owens.

“If the author has a new type of access to the kingdom and the kingdom to write a positive book about the new monarch, which is not very popular, especially in comparison with his German mayor, Eduardo VIII”, said Owens a BBC Mundo.

Jorge VI was crowned King of England in 1937 through the abdication of his son Eduardo VIII. Photo: GETTY IMAGES

“Since Jorge was a Principal and student of the University of Cambridge, he was a smoker dressed for the University’s ropa. On the other hand, the director says that he should give the best example: ‘You are a member of the real family’, to which the young principle and future rey respond: ‘We are not a family, we are a company’”, Relata Owens.

The historian explains that the expression, in this context, would require that the public and the public service come first and the families and places of the private life are despised.

“For that matter, it’s the term and it’s used as part of my book, although it’s most likely that the anecdote is inventive,” Owens said.

“What Beverley Baxter’s book seeks to express is that members of the realm can not enjoy an ordinary private life, personal moments, because there are many compromises with its public role. Here is the original term, with this idea deber, service, victimization propio.

“I believe that it is unlikely that Jorge VI will be so, but the fascinating thing is that he attributed it to a book in 1938 that was part of a strategy for public relations on the part of the real family, or the company, for presented to Jorge VI as a rey obediente and abnegado que ponía sus deseos privados, in especial el disfrute de una vida known privada, por detrás del deber de ser rey ”.

In principle, Jorge VI was not as popular as his brother Eduardo. Photo: GETTY IMAGES

“It was a complete contrast to the figure of Eduardo VIII, his German mayor, who abdicated in favor of his life and his personal realization in the end of his time as monarch,” added Owens.

Who is part of “La firma”

The significance of Jorge VI’s superstitious words defines the concept that he expresses the principle of Felipe in his commentary on Isabel’s quarrel and which appears to be the most persistent in this.

The Duke of Edimburg refers to all the staff who work around the real family: the courtiers, the strategists, the secretaries, the experts in public relations”, Apunta Owens.

And it is that, effectively, the British real family is a company that has more than its own members, with all the secretariat of private secretaries, communication officers, department heads, drivers, assistants, gardeners and all those who lead y las vidas de quienes viven en ellos.

The “company” engloba has a conglomerate of assistants and communication assessors who are more than the real family property. Photo: GETTY IMAGES

The real family has a huge financial power. From 2019 onwards sales Forbes treasure the net worth of the heritage of the Queen ascends to $ 500 million.

“The Windsor House is a big deal, albeit with the most support and confidence that the ball of values. It’s hoped that all the real executives and their allies will have all the efforts to avoid any scandalous indication that the reputation of the family bargaining can be achieved, ”said Penny Junor.

Buckingham Palace on its own more than 400 employees that manejan todo, desde en enorme negotio de catering para las docenes de banquetes, fiestas y cenas de estad albergadas por la reina, hasta un compellejo apparatus of public relations in the style empresarial formed by persons of the world of periodism or politics.

The feeling that Meghan says

During Meghan and Harry’s interview with Oprah Winfrey, the duke of Sussex eligió refers to a whole conglomerate in a way to mention Windsor.

“I believe she used the term in the line expressed by the principle Felipe. It refers to this group of other individuals that exist to serve the real family. “Specialists of RR.PP., private secretaries, persons who monitor the press constantly to see what is written about the family, that filter information about the members of the realm and make decisions in its number”, opin Owens.

“When you’re the boss of the ‘Firma’, you have people who tell you that you do not know”, says the principle Harry hablando about his abuela, the queen Isabel II. Photo: GETTY IMAGES

“Oimos in the interview that Meghan did not say goodbye, that members of the company – are courtesy of Palacio- le dijeron who did not hesitate to show and be photographed with his friends by the media attention he received.

“If the real family’s hobbies enslave themselves, personalized and well-behaved hybrids are thought to haunt us, Cambridge, Cornwall, the proprietary monarch of Felipe, Peru no eran ellos a los que se refería“, Enfatiza el historiador.

La reina y su propia firma

To make the most of it, the queen Isabel formed in December of 2020 her “company of 8”, a select group of eight members of the realm that represents the family publicly and maintains its staff rule of “one must be seen to be created”.

The group includes Carlos and his wife Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall; the principle of William and his wife Kate Middleton, Duchess of Cambridge; the principle of Edward and his wife Sophie, condescension of Wessex; Princess Anne y, by supuesto, the real queen, who appears to have had immunity from the interview.

For Queen Isabel II, the public representation of her family is extremely important. Photo: REUTERS

In the long run of her, and sing the duration of some revelations, as Meghan as Harry expresses himself with the caricature of the monarch.

“It’s what he’s doing to the principle of interviewing, but it’s Meghan’s who was carefully planned by her and his team,” Owens said.

“I believe that Harry and Meghan’s hubieran committed a major error in terms of a serious series of punishments perpetrated by the public in Reino Unido as well as in the rest of the world. the most popular and respected person of the Windsor House”.

Source