Darren Drysdale appears to have been approached by Alan Judge, of Ipswich Town, when he pleaded guilty to protesting against a penalty.
British referee Darren Drysdale has been accused by the controversy incident of protagonizing this March, when he met center-back Alan Judge, of Ipswich Town, during a match he held at an English club against Northampton Town.
In the final tram of the road, Drysdale, 49 years old, the cabbage turned the International of the Republic of Ireland and appeared briefly to the judge, who had joined in protesting that he had not been punished. El colegiado fue Separation of Judge by various players antes de mostrarle una tarjeta amarilla.
Drysdale is giving a monthly admission and issuing a trip from the Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL), and it should be allowed as ‘no mantuvo la compostura’.
“Only I can talk to Alan and Ipswich Town”, says Drysdale. In this sense, hizo hincapié in “lo importante que es par nosotros como árbitros mantener dur compostura durante tode juego y relacionarnos siempre con los jugadores de una profesional”. “Lamento no haberlo hecho”, conclusion.
“The calorie of the moment”
Arbitro was accused of delaying the conduct of the Football Association. For its part, the proposition Regter assures that, in respect of it, the “terminated” incident as soon as the cancellation is abandoned.
“The arbitrators have a hard work and fue the caloric of the moment, as sucede in football “, indicates Regter on the club’s web site. The player affirms that he did not look for the suspects of the referee or an accusation against him.” Nunca iba a haber una queja de mí y lo dejé claro “, añadió.
Controversy in the Red
Meanwhile, Drysdale receives numerous support models for line hinges, some of the ones señalaron that the arbitrators are subject to dismissal by the judiciary. A user indicator which can be seen on the footballing ground “aggressively burdensome” haci Drysdale before the shock, and results that the referees “are easy blanks for some idiots”.
“How come the arbiter is here the malo?”, to ask another internet, at the time that subdivided that molestan players to collegiates “during all the game” as they could do and decide what they wanted.
Prohibition of probes, otros argumentative that “a professional judge can control the game and check yourselfThe players are accused of doing this, they have no excuse for a colleague to agree in this way, apunta a person to conclude: “if you can not control the game without physically attacking the players, get a new job”.
If you like it, share it with your friends!