At the time of earning a living, we immediately think of a series of attributes that have a salutary life. About everything, ask for good habits, as for example comer mejor y hacer eiercicio físico gereeld. But we also have less stress and are more satisfied with the life we have. Without embarrassment, the last months of agitation and dystopia that we live in are due to the pandemic and its consequences. the message.
This is exactly what is called ‘epistemic property’: the ability of an individual to differentiate between what he is worth and what he thinks, descending false fades and encountering false fades. Although it may appear trivial, the information bombardment that we have seen since the beginning of the sanitary crisis, the great variety of information sources and the proprietary realization proposition caused by the new context surgeido a raisde de pandemia han humavado cualquilde aspiration to approximate the knowledge of the world. Al fin y al cabo, if we do not have a real photograph of what is happening then we can approach the manner in which it is due, both on an individual level as a collective.
“The ‘epistemic well-being’ will hold the power to know what is mysterious to you as you grow alive”
These are some of the findings that are based on a recent article published in the magazine ‘Aeon’ and written by Kenneth Boyd, researcher of the University of Southern Denmark and leading an ambitious project called ‘Scientific Testimony in a Diverse Society’, which as its number intends to analyze the diversity of scientific and anticipatory discourses in this era and its consequences for social cognition what she calls “epistemic justice “, which we see will be detained.
“The ‘epistemic asset’ is to have the power to lie to know what it is mysterious for you at a certain moment for your life to progress”, defines Boyd- “This power implies the height of ask for general knowledge to make sure you find answers to questions that are important to you, for your curiosity, but also to know what you need to know about logging your personal projects. If you have multiple sources of information and your ability to obtain responses when necessary, then you have a high degree of ‘epistemic well-being’. If, on the other hand, you are riddled with lies or simply do not have time to warn those who need saber, careces de él “.
Tres factories
Boyd distinguishes three conditions for an individual to possess an ‘epistemic asset’: access to information sources that count the world, who can trust in dichas fuentes y, in third place, deelnemer in a productive dialogue with the rest of his entourage. “The access to the world is the basis of ‘bienestar epistémico'”, the investigator investigates. “It can be frustrating in many ways: it has no connection or the ability to connect to the Internet or has editorial censorship”. This factor itself does not imply that it has any knowledge, since access to the sources of information can be here, but if it is not reliable, there will be no need to say anything.
Do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us for information on how to reflect on various points of view.
Here is the difference between what is known as the Society for Information and the Society of Knowledge, being both correlative and pudding in the future. For a lot of information that a social collective has no choice but to know more about the entourage in what lives the things that pass, sin on the contrary: it produces what the OMS denominated ‘infodemia’, term surged by the calorie of them bulos, conspiracies and false notices that he has been injured since the commencement of the pandemic and that, judging by the actual situation, no tuvieron will have a determinant papel then estuvieron tan ligados in the social context as of now.
In order for this ‘infodemia’ not to be produced, we will distinguish the grain of the road, the scientifically demonstrated by the falsified argument, the value of lying. And here is where the quality and security of our sources and the level of confidence that we have in them come into play. The eye of the conspiracy theories is debatable, in this sense, there is a social tendency to disagree with the official relationship and listen to alternative sources that then pabule to ideas of the most disparate. When more confidence is gained in these things, sean buenas o malas, burgemeester sera el grado de engaño o conocimiento.
EZ
Ultimately, no one will have access to the brief, contrasting information and if we do not reach out to anyone who comments on it, we will reflect on various points of view. Here is where to enter the third condition in order to be called ‘epistemic property’: the sensation that an individual can participate in a productive and constructive dialogue. Al fin y al cabo, if you do not have a social circle about which you can share your information without having to go through a vision that amplifies the general of the people. This condition is not alone in the most restricted ideological or political sense, but also in its most important day:
The “epistemic justice”
Who has the desire to share with another new person who knows what he or she has learned? If we do not have a social group that supports and estimates our knowledge in terms of matter, then as well as what we are discussing and discussing, we are in a very unfavorable position. Hecho, Boyd assumes that the people who are not aware of this condition are victims of what he called ‘epistemic justice’.
‘Epistemic justice’ has affected sectors of the population that have not been informed or informed, but also in the culture of cancellation
Esta se produces when a subject is denied the opportunity to defend or listen to his opinion. The investigator listened to some marginalized groups of minors, some of whom are more suffocating and argumentative, while also inevitably agreeing with the culture of cancellation and all that is common in our days. We live in a time when we are desperate much passion and vehemence in the debate, of which on occasions the forms and discussions acaben in personal attacks and decalcifications when the censorship or the boycott are committed to not agreeing with an opinion. It can derive its intentions to raise the reputation of the people for its unpopular opinions on a topic.
For this reason, the ‘epistemic asset’ has become more necessary than ever to have a rich and satisfying life in the midst of the Great Depression that reigns in our days. Llevandolo has a more profound and obedient sphere to which he subdues his care at the social level, we can argue that There is also a shortage of information about us and the people we meet., which has been agitated by this exceptional situation as a pandemic.
The psychological phenomenon of realization is one of the most frequent today, manifested in four episodes of stress or anxiety, which leads to the impossibility of recognizing one another and the most important people. The lack of physical social interaction and the successive quarantines he provoked that his most defiant verns were reflected in the other, that he had become a sentient being in front of the world and ours. In conclusion, we must make a joint effort to confront this situation in which no one will have to worry about it.