- Redaction
- BBC News Mundo

Source of the image, Getty Images
The documentary examines the fact that the media has the song and the figure of his father as a legal tutor.
Both contestants will take part in a popular United States television contest. The presenter must make a question and they must state all the possible answers, which appear in a slippery slope of the program conductor.
“What did Britney Spears lose?”, Asks the presenter.
“El pelo”, dice a contestant. “The cordura”, signals its opponent, addressing the giants of the public.
It’s one of the scenes of Framed by Britney Spears, the documentary produced by The New York Times about the “princess of the pop” who analyzes the ascension of the singer and the controversy that surrounds the tutelage that owns her father about her.
The documentary, trained on the Hulu platform, does not only cover the mystery of the legal ownership of his ancestor, which generated a very popular movement, Free Britney, and that the propantant had fought.
También pone en evidencia la machista press campaign through the means of communication and entertainment to the length of his career.
“The documentary is a critique of the conversation we have about women, representation and trauma,” wrote Patricia Grisafi, a NBC columnist.
“In the tradition of aunts’ stories of ‘women lying in the attic’ in front of her, Framed by Britney Spears it seems that when the boy opens the door to reveal himself to a bruise that spews on the buttocks, his maths of a human being, fully competent, fully competent, who benefits from a significant work, to spend time with his heifers and an account from Instagram “.
A humble niece of Kentwood
The audiovisual piece recounts the history of Spears and traces of certain voices to the artist, as well as key figures of industry, such as the paparazzizi.
In a note at the end of the documentary, the NYT signaled that he had contacted the artist to ask him to participate, but “it is not clear if he received his request”.
And it’s that Spears left since 2008 without legal capacity to take decisions on its own account.
The legal guardian who owns his father for preoccupations with his mental health is obligated to pay consent for everything, and if you have been working as any other artist, you have a permanent show in Las Vegas.
His legal tutor also manages his estate.
Source of the image, Getty Images
Jamie Spears has been the legal tutor for 39 years since 2008.
To understand the point at which the song is sung, the documentary echoes the vista atras, has its origins in a humble Kentwood family, which is pierced by the gift of the little Britney to sing for the crown of the church and treat to create .
The documentary describes a always waiting mother, who accompanies all parties always on stage, is a more distant and caring father for the diner.
Ambos, without embarrassment, adheres to the principle and with the desire to advance in his musical career.
The career of Spears empies to despair when it comes to a papel, with only 11 years, in the Club Mickey Mouse, the Disney program in which coincided with Christina Aguilera, Ryan Gosling and other stars.
Only six years have passed, training on his debut album, Sweetie just one more time, catching up with the trend of the success of bands formed exclusively by chicos and alzándole has the Grammy pocos years later with his simple Toxic.
Although the documentary does not deal with the mystery surrounding the artist and his case, various interviews are read about his personality and talent.
Felicia Culotta, a friend of the family and who for many years has been a Spears personal assistant, participated in the documentary to “record what the man loves [de Spears]”y eso es exactly what you want.
Source of the image, Getty Images
Seguidores del movimiento “Free Britney” en ‘n protesta en Los Ángeles el año pasado.
Culotta, who was separated from his wife when the father of the singer stepped to administer his estate, shared the photographs that Spears had in the gears and mandated by his mother, showing his dulzura, and some specified moments.
For example, one of the Spears to Kentwood routes, in which, very famously, US $ 100 tickets were exchanged to congratulate Navidad, did not say anything more. “No plan and plan: ‘Hello, soy Britney Spears’. Simply decía: ‘Happy Navidad'”, Culotta statement.
Like other companions of gira or associates who appear in the documentary refer to the idea that the artist does not have his own decisions, description as a song as a centered person and in control of his work.
The persecution of the paparazzi and the media
The documentary also exposes the attacks on the young star, the sexism and the grave pressure on his figure from which he was crowned as the princess of the pope.
From time immemorial, it participates in programs and tends to respond to questions such as what the host is a presenter con tan solo 11 years, through an actuation. “¿Tienes novio?”, The dice, to make it clear that the parish is the same as the parish.
One of the moments “most devastating” of documentary, written by Mary Sollosi, de Entertainment weekly, se produce through the rupture with Justin Timberlake, and 2002.
Timberlake “approves, without any kind of effort, the latent sexism of the stadiums to present it quickly as the male and the same as the victim (with the video clip of A river cries for me as the most familiar example, in that it appears a chic with the incomprehensible aspect of Spears as the exnovia traidora) “, signaled Sollosi.
Source of the image, Getty Images
The mediated treatment of the Spears and Timberlake rupture was also analyzed in the documentary.
At the moment of the documentary, the distant mediums follow this narrative, including claiming to have been interviewed in song while at least having sexual relations with Spears before the rupture, to which he responds affirmatively and between giants.
At the same time, Britney Spears was interviewed by those who asked about his virginity, the question directly about “the great pain” for the rumors circulating in England, without proof; is a public commentary on the Maryland governor’s assurance that he will have the opportunity to appear before Britney Spears.
“The time to attack a woman,” Wesley Morris said, one of the NYT critics analyzing the situation in the documentary, “hooi todo un apparatato listo par hacerlo”.
Hulu’s documentary also shows an interview on NBC about Spears being attacked by an image of him appearing with his baby in his mania, and coming back at this point losing and losing weight.
Framed by Britney Spears also interviewed by paparazzo Daniel Ramos, sadly told by the man that Spears was attacking a Paraguayan.
The photographer, who stays with the artist for years, comments that his photos are sold by communal figures and show some pieces of delicate moments for the artist, in the middle of the dispute over the custody of his wife, night and day , constantly.
It’s like Spears trying to escape the foxes, derrumbándose in interviews to explain that his mayor now is that he accepts this persecution.
“We will not give you any information or information that you would like to hear ‘No les aprecio, déjenme en paz‘”, Ramos defends in the documentary. To what does the interviewer answer:” And when did he say:’ Déjenme en paz ‘? “.
As it is known, the crisis has shattered the rupture with its first marijuana, the battle to see its homes, the dudas about societies that are supuestamentally approved by those who enter mental health centers are also immortalized in their rooms.
His crisis led to the administration of justice the legal guardian over his father, a circumstance that in a principle is considered temporal, but that all remains vigilant, and that “Framing Britney Spears” tries to analyze, although it does not bring anything new.
For this, also interview activists of the “Free Britney” movement (Liberen a Britney) que creen que the song is being checked against their will.
Last November, the pop star star had a legal intention to return the title to his ancestor. He, for his part, always defended his role and made sure that he was protecting his wife from having “those with selfish interests and that she could do that”.
“I have enough capacity to say ‘I do not want my father to be my legal tutor, I do not want to act if he is a siendolo. Quiza does not need a tutor”, commented the singer’s ex-husband, Adam Streisand, in the documentary.
Hecho, the audiovisual project of The New York Times received with appreciation by critics and followers of the star, and generosity newly named “liberarla”, as actress Sarah Jessica Parker.
As written by Mary Sollosi, de Entertainment weekly, “The parties involved have given away information in order for the document to read a concrete conclusion on the mental, legal or financial circumstances of Spears”.
Pero, “tras ver desarrollarse los hechos con el beneficio de la retrospective et el context, es tifile terminar de ver Framed by Britney Spears creating that [la cantante] no ha sido dañada en repetidas ocasiones “.
Recuerda row can receive notifications from BBC Mundo. Descarga our app and activates to lose our best content.