The conflict between the parties and the Central Electoral Union (JCE) over the issue of order in the ballot box and the economic contribution of law and order. This is a constant in the final decisions on this point.
It appears that the electoral administration body regulates this aspect has found inconsistencies in any political sector that has been judged.
The resolutions issued in the last three managements of the JCE have held this element in common, because no logger concludes the consensus of the political class.
As a general rule, the minority parties that have complied with the criterion established by the constitutional body, which has varying the number of administrative bodies.
The disputes have transcended the junta’s aspirations, but the political organizations have not been limited to making revision appeals before the election of an electoral administration, so that they can decide on the conflicts in the Electoral Superior Tribunal (TSE) and the Superior Administrative Tribunal (TSA), that he emits cases in distant deserved, the cases he obliged the JCE to modify the resolutions to act the sentences.
The most recent controversy has led to the passage of Resolution 01-2021, issued on January 27 by the JCE, which presides Román Jáquez Liranzo.
Mediante is the norm, the Junta establishes that the ballot box of the parties in the ballot for the elections of 2024 and the economic support that will be based on the valid votes obtained individually by each one in the three levels of the presidential election and from debates in the comic strips of 2020.
This criterion has been rejected by various parties, which claim that the media favored the majority municipalities, the Modern Revolutionary Party (PRM) and the Dominican Liberation (PLD), which occupy the first ballots in the ballot box and accede to 80 by state of financial financing.
Disgruntled parties with the media are launching a battle now in the junta, mediating the appeal of revision, in lieu, in the event of obtaining sanction, assisting the judicial authorities.
Previous conflicts
In the recent proceedings of the JCE, chaired by Julio César Castaños Guzmán, and Roberto Rosario, similar conflicts have been raised on the same point, which concludes a series of sentences issued by the Superior Electoral Tribunal (TSE) and the TSA Tribunal )).
In 2016, the JCE decided that the criterion should be taken into account only in the votes of the presidential level of the celebrating comics this year.
A year later, by el 2017, the Junta variable is a parameter that supports a revision of party variants.
Other organizations that are considered affected, reconsider this resolution before the Electoral Superior Tribunal (TSE), that they support the request for somatic nullity and in the sentence TSE-013-2017, decided that they should be subject to the votes of the presidential level, comic determined antes.
This case was rejected by the Constitutional Tribunal, in order to grant an appeal, and the TSA will be forwarded to the competent jurisdiction for this type of conflict.
More late, in January 2019, The Presidency of the TSA, in order to reach a middle ground, determines that the parameter to be taken into account for the municipal elections of April 2020 will be the votes of the presidential level of the 2016 commissions.
In May 2020, the TSA resumed the administrative contention recourse against the JCE Resolution, over which the criterion of the order of ballot papers for presidential and legislative elections this year takes precedence. according to the summary of the valid elections obtained in individual ways by each party at the presidential, congressional and municipal levels of the May 2016 elections.
The JCE should retrieve the previous resolution that was dictated
Three Level Vote
In the motivations of Resolution 01-2021, the JCE determines that the criterion for determining the opinion of political parties, groups and political movements in the 2024 ballot paper must be the sum of the votes taken in each form individually. organization in 1os 3 levels that will be disputed in the last elections, that is, the election of July 5, 2020, is decisive, presidential, senatorial and deputations, is the last compound for the territorial disputes and the ultramar disputes.
In the decision, adopted by the Mayor of 4 of the 5 members of the Plenum, the entity stated that the total number of valid votes obtained by each organization on the valid vote of 1 of the 3 electoral votes would be extended.
Consider that “with the application of the criteria referred to above, the collective effort expended by the political organizations in the prosecution of the popular voluntary to 1os boetes van die obtener 1os cargos elivos en 1os niveles en disputa.”