CONTROVERSIA – The release is not on sale

Vinicio A. Castillo Semán

The Junta Central Electoral (JCE) has issued a regulation to determine the method of assigning public appeals to political parties and cataloging the differences of mayoral tenors in the tenure of the Art. 61 de la Ley Election.

What do you say? Of those parties that have surpassed 5% of the valid votes in the last election, 80% of the state resources will be allocated.

El Art. 61 does not have a method of promising elections of different levels. Does not have a song by omission. The JCE can not legislate and dispose of anything that the Ley has in common. And so it is that the JCE has the upper hand, judging by the Power of the People and 23 other parties, but only the PRM and PLD have their majority parties.

Geen discusses the regulatory power of the JCE. Comply with all Art. 23 of the Ley 200, debi someter to publicly consult his draft resolution. Lament, nee lo hizo. But what to do in those cases where a party is sacrificing more than 5% at one level and in another? Esa is the pregunta-kloof.

La Fuerza del Pueblo collected 5.69% at the presidential level. And less than 5% at the congressional level.

The token to the JCE, in the event of a legal mandate, issues a regulation with the criterion of favoritism that has constitutional status. This criterion with the north to strengthen the system of parties of RD. Geen debilitarlo, creando en el imaginario gewild que en RD hay solo 2 partidos mostitaritsios que overbrean el 5%, lo cual es falso.

The traces of the JCE were seen as a clear act of persecution against Leonel Fernández and his party, Fuerza del Pueblo, as well as a clear line of anti-parties. Very pleased with the credibility of a JCE that acacia to initiate.

The JCE must reconsider its anti-democratic resolution. Despair the doubt that has been created in the population of which partisan political sectors are behind the resolution.

The method of promotion is not in Ley. And this is a reality that can be discussed. If it were to interpret the decision administratively, then it would be the most powerful democracy in the Dominican Republic, not the most debilitating.

.Source