‘n guns de que see unconstitutional el juicio politico’ n Trump

Por Dareh Gregorian section NBC News

The Republicans in the Senate will vote this March in favor of a media that unconstitutionally declares the process of political juicing against President Donald Trump, alleging that he could not be tried for being convicted because he was not in the cargo area.

The motion, presented by Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, was rejected by a 55-45 vote., demonstrates that Democrats have a coal-fired truck to secure the 67 necessary votes for a Trump election.

Among those who voted in favor of Paul’s motion to endorse the leader of the Senate minority, Mitch McConnell, who said he was indecisive about joining Trump and working on the calendar of juices with the leader of the Mayor of Senado, Chuck Schumer, Democrat by New York.

In this footage of a video of the Senate, being shown to the Republican Senator by Kentucky Rand Paul, presenting a motion to declare unconstitutional the political juice against President Donald Trump; January 26, 2021.AP

McConnell, when he was the leader of the mayoralty, reshuffle the Democrats’ efforts to realize Trump’s juicy stubbornness in the cargo hold.

The senators will perform jurisdiction over the second political trial of Trump on March, a day after the Democratic Fiscal Democrats of the Chamber of Deputies introduced to the Senate the article of political juice against Trump to incite insurgency in the stories of the Capitol.

Senators will receive Senator Patrick Leahy’s jury, a Democrat from Vermont presiding over the Senate.

[El inspector general investigará si algún funcionario del Departamento de Justicia intentó ayudar a Trump a revertir las elecciones]

“It is a matter of law, that in any case it relates to the judgment of Donald John Trump, President of the United States, now pending, has impartial justice agreed with the Constitution and the laws, God forbid?”, Verklaar Leahy to the senators. reunited.

Leahy President of El Juicio en lugar del Presidente del Tribunal Supremo John Roberts, because Trump is now an president.

Trump’s “ex” status has led Republican variants to argue that there can be no political justice, because the Constitution says “justice in the cases of accusation does not extend more than that of cargo dispensing and decalification to own and enjoy any honor, trust or luxury office in United States “.

A defender of this point of view, the professor of law of the University of George Washington, Jonathan Turley, spoke with the Republicans of the Senate in a deadly antecedent judgment of March.

Turley, who testified against Trump’s first political juiciness in the Camera Bay, has said that it is also contrary to the second political juices, saying that it is “in contradiction with the language of the Constitution” because the juices were delivered when Trump was not in the cargo area.

[Qué dice la carta que Trump le dejó a Biden en la Casa Blanca y cómo dejarle una al sucesor se convirtió en una tradición en EE.UU.]

“We have a difficult decision to make”, said Turley to the journalists after the death.

Wait a minute, Paul said to vote on the issue of constitutionality in the Senate on March. Los ciudadanos privados geen son acusados [en un impeachment]. “Political juicing is about the distribution of cargo, and the accusation here is the cargo”, dijo.

“This political juiciness is nothing more than a partisan extremist designed to divide more than the country”, agregó Paul, “the democrats afirman querer unify pais, pero llevar a juitiio politico a un expresident, un ciudadano privada, es la antitesis de la unidad”.

Paul celebrates the strong support of his Republican partners: “45 senators coincide in that this farce of justice is unconstitutional. This juice is dead in the Senate“, only after voting.

But Senator Rob Portman, a Republican from Ohio, said he would like to see only the vote that is in favor of debating the issue of constitutionality, and that the vote does not necessarily mean that it will vote in favor of the final verdict. “It’s a totally different theme that I respect,” said Portman.

[Dónde será obligatorio usar mascarilla según las órdenes ejecutivas de Biden]

Only 50 of the 50 Republican senators will vote against Paul’s motion. Fueron Ben Sasse of Nebraska, Susan Collins of Maine, Mitt Romney of Utah, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania.

“In my opinion, the text and context of the Constitution, the meaning of the term ‘political juice’ for founders and the most relevant precedents indicated that it is constitutionally permissible that the Senate considers President Trump’s political juice”, said Toomey in a posterior declaration.

The Democrats want to have a precedent for their party. If no former president has been convicted by the Senate after deporting the cargo, Guerra William Belknap’s secretary was judged by the Senate in 1876 after she had been convicted.

And the legal experts, like Harvard Laurence Tribe’s law professor and Texas University law professor Steve Vladeck, understand that the judiciary is unconstitutional because of the considerations that must be made by the Senate, and if Trump is banned. a cargo in the Federal Governor.

The Democrats signal that Trump was accused by the Cámara Baja while he was stationed in the cargo, and maintain a juice is necessary for liability. For this reason, Schumer called it “the most indescribable thing that he has ever done as president”, inciting a disturbance in the Capitol while holding a joint session of the Congregation contesting the votes of the Electoral College.

Fiscal Democrats Cheryl Johnson and Tim Blodgett have filed a lawsuit seeking injunction against Trump on July 25, 2021.AP

If Trump were to run for the votes of the ballot, the Senate would be able to vote to be decommissioned in order to occupy a cargo in the future.

[Los republicanos se rinden y cesan su bloqueo del Senado, que amenaza con retrasar las reformas prometidas por Biden]

Well, some senators have compared their papers in the political juices with the members of the jury in a traditional juice, in reality it is more than that. You can vote for Leahy and cancel decisions regarding the admissibility of tests and tests, for example.

The Prime Minister of the Supreme Court, William Rehnquist, chaired the Bill Clinton political trial in 1999, concluded: “The Senate is not simply a jury. It is a tribunal in this case”.

In this particular case, they also have their victims, despite being fired for their security after a Trump party turbo crashes into the Capitol on January 6. Five people murmur in the chaos, including a Capitol police officer, Brian Sicknick.

It is hoped that the trial in the Senate will begin on the week of February 8 in virtue of an agreement reached between the parties. Senate Republicans have been calling for more time to allow Trump’s lawyers to prepare.

[Los demócratas logran el control del Senado, ¿por qué es tan importante?]

The Chamber of Deputies, controlled by the Democrats, approved the article on political justice on January 13 in a vote of 232-197. On this occasion, two Republicans voted to vote for Trump, the most bipartisan voter in history in a presidential political trial, duplicating the five Democrats who voted to vote for Clinton.

Source